# Archival memory feedback **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Tags:** feedback\ **Created:** [July 30, 2025, 11:00pm UTC](https://forum.letta.com/t/archival-memory-feedback/50 "2025-07-30T23:00:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![cameron](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.letta.com/cameron/32/99_2.png) [@cameron](https://forum.letta.com/u/cameron)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2025, 11:00pm UTC](https://forum.letta.com/t/archival-memory-feedback/50/1 "2025-07-30T23:00:39Z")
We are looking for feedback on Letta’s [archival memory](https://docs.letta.com/guides/ade/archival-memory) feature. We haven’t given archival memory as much love as we should have, in part because we have been focused on core context components like [memory blocks](https://docs.letta.com/guides/agents/memory-blocks) and [filesystem](https://docs.letta.com/guides/agents/filesystem). Archival memory is an agent-specific way to store and offload general purpose documents, and basically function as free RAG systems. I like that it is flexible and can handle pretty much any document I want out-of-context. Archival memory is not currently shareable across Letta agents. It’s also very difficult to transfer across agents, and it requires building client-side scaffolding with the SDK. My Bluesky bot [Void](https://bsky.app/profile/void.comind.network) uses archival memory heavily – apparently, it makes up nearly 30% of all archival memory storage on Letta Cloud with about 22k memories. I personally love archival memory. So, we want to know a few things about how you use archival memory! - How are you using archival memory right now? - Would you be interested in having agents be able to share archival memories, similar to how they can share memory blocks and folders? - What are the biggest pain points you have with archival memory? - What’s on your wishlist for archival memory? Thanks for any feedback, it helps us a lot.